Features
 Current Features
 Past Features





Feature Story - September 2006

Insurance

Wrapping up Wrap Policies for Multi-Family Construction

by Blake Johnson


While general contractors and trade contractors are often at odds with one another over various insurance issues, they are on the same page when it comes to the coverage they have for work performed on condominium or town house projects. Almost every general liability policy issued to a contractor contains some type of multifamily exclusion. For this and other reasons, a Wrap policy is necessary on these types of projects.

advertisement

In basic terms, a residential Wrap policy is nothing more than a standard commercial general liability policy modified to cover the developer, the general contractor and all subcontractors involved at the project site. This policy is further modified to provide up to three years of Premises/Operations coverage (the time allowed to complete the project) and Completed Operations coverage for all of these participants through the applicable Statute of Repose in the state in which the project is being built. This solves the insurance problem for the general contractor and the trade contractors and allows the developer to pick the construction team best suited for their project.

The driver is construction defect litigation and the ready-made source of opportunity for the plaintiff attorneys created by a large number of homes being attached to one another and HOA's more than willing to talk to them or a Board of Directors afraid not to. When and if a class-action suit is filed, the Wrap policy is in a much better position to prevail. The reason for this is that instead of the plaintiff attorney having 15-20 separate liability carriers with which to negotiate settlements, there is only one, and they represent the project.

As an insurance product designed to cover the exposures inherent in multifamily construction, the Wrap policy does a pretty good job. There are, however, some very important limitations of which to be aware. One of the biggest is how the costs associated with defending a claim are handled. With most general liability policies issued to contractors, these costs fall outside their limits of liability. In other words, these costs do not reduce the limits being provided. Under a Wrap policy, these defense costs fall within the limits of liability and do reduce them as these costs are incurred. This being the case, a $1 million policy can be a scary thought on even the smallest project. Below are other factors to consider when contemplating getting involved in a Wrap:

  • Completed Operations Aggregate applies for the entire policy period (Statute of Repose period) and covers all of the participants

  • Typically a Mold Exclusion

  • Typically an EIFS Exclusion

  • Typically a Professional Liability Exclusion

  • Typically a significant Self Insured Retention (SIR) or Deductible

  • Premium is 100% fully earned after 12 months (no return premium)

    In most cases, it is the owner/developer who pays for this policy. For this reason it is often referred to as an OCIP or Owner Controlled Insurance Program. Make no mistake, these policies are very expensive and can have a major impact on a project's Performa. This creates the often heated discussion between owner and contractor as to what are adequate limits for the project.

    Where an owner and contractor may initially agree on what is adequate, the economics in terms of "cost per unit" eventually enters into the equation. On larger projects this is always a point of contention between the owner and the contractors. On smaller projects where the perceived risk is less given a smaller number of units, the owner runs into minimum premiums that can make the cost prohibitive.

    There is no question that adequate insurance coverage is important on these types of projects. However, no amount of coverage is enough on a poorly designed and/or constructed project. Therefore, doing everything possible during the design phase and construction phase to minimize the potential for construction defect claims down the road is imperative. Several Wrap carriers require the use of a third party inspection service as well as a third party peer review of all design documents. As a contractor looking to get involved in an attached housing project, having all of these safeguards in place is every bit as important as the limits and coverage being provided.

    Blake Johnson is the vice president of Minard-Ames Insurance Group, located in Phoenix. He can be reached at bjohnson@minardames.com


  •  Click here for more Features >>


     


    Sponsors

    © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
    All Rights Reserved