|
Shopping Malls and Controversy
By
Catherine Coggan
In the 1970s, New Mexico shouldered its share of the radical
social and economic changes of the era. There were lines at
local gas stations, hippies setting up communes in Madrid
and Taos and general unease about the rising political chaos
in Nixon's White House. Nonetheless, New Mexico continued
to grow and the construction industry was part of that development.
The 1972 U.S. Department of Commerce Census of the Construction
Industry, the first such survey of the industry since before
World War II, revealed that there were over 4,000 general
contractors in New Mexico at the beginning of the decade.
The state's building industry purchased $230 million worth
of materials, generated receipts of $777 million and enjoyed
a total state-wide payroll of $168 million for more than 23,000
workers.
From 1967 to 1972, receipts for single-family houses had
increased 198 percent, from $55 million to $163 million. There
was also a 25 percent growth in non-residential building,
too, that went from $68 million to $85 million. Highway and
street construction in that same period rose 101 percent from
$44 million to $88 million. Only Colorado, Arizona and Utah
did better in what the government designated "the Mountain
States": Idaho, Montana, Colorado, Nevada, Arizona, Utah,
Wyoming and New Mexico.
In the 70s, New Mexico's first two shopping malls went up:
the Coronado in Albuquerque and the DeVargas in Santa Fe.
A new publication got off the ground. Calling itself New Mexico
Building Magazine, it was published by Type-O-Graphics in
Albuquerque and edited by Cecil Kinney. A fairly unsophisticated
monthly, NM Building Magazine nevertheless kept local builders
up-to-date with tidbits such as "the city of Moriarty
issued nine building permits." Readers also knew that
Stan Davis, of Davis Associates, was the local AGC president
at the time. In one short piece, entitled "Federal Aid
to Women," the magazine warned that the Federal government
was "at it again," launching a campaign to promote
businesses, especially construction firms, owned and operated
by women."
Some of the highway projects during the 1970s were the $66,896
contract to build the Yucca & Gage rest stop along Interstate
10, $1.5 million contract for 5.3 miles of the NM 60/U.S.
180 and the $171,599 road project at the top of LaBajada just
outside of Santa Fe that connected Interstate 25 with U.S.
85.
Despite all this positive activity, what truly dogged the
industry all through the 70s and into the 80s was the scandal
and corruption in the New Mexico State Construction Industries
Commission.
In 1972 an editorial in the Albuquerque Journal castigated
the Commission for failing to publicize or even follow through
on its responsibilities and powers to protect home-buyers
from builders who failed to carry out their promises. "It
is unfortunate," said the editorial, "that this
commission and the three sub-boards over which it rules, prefer
not to publicize the services available which then forces
home-buyers, unaware of their options, into expensive litigation."
In 1974, two members of the commission allegedly took money
to help applicants pass the contractor's licensing tests.
It seemed that every year brought new allegations about misuse
of power.
Finally, in 1979, everything reached fever pitch when three
major offenses came to light: only 75 percent of building
inspections in the state were being done, licenses were not
being distributed fairly and consumer complaints were being
ignored. Bruce King, New Mexico's then governor, directed
John Salvo, his commerce & industry secretary, to launch
an investigation.
Within days, two top administrators, John Block and Robert
Bernsten, were asked to leave.
Block submitted a dramatic letter of resignation then went
public with it. He accused his close friend, King, of "crucifying"
him. "Governor," he wrote, "with your lack
of support and your lack of faith and confidence in me, the
assassination has been carried out. The crucifixion is complete.
I am bleeding."
Despite Block's theatrical maneuver, King held his ground
and appointed Ernest Coriz, the deputy director of the Commerce
& Industry Department, as interim director of the nearly
moribund Construction Industry Commission.
Coriz immediately began housecleaning. He fired one of the
state's electrical inspectors for violating seven personnel
regulations, none of which were revealed. But what was exposed,
however, was that nearly a quarter of electrical inspections
in the state were never done. Coriz then hired the Peat, Marwick
& Mitchell accounting firm, paid them $15,000 and asked
them to help the Commission make better use of its employees.
Along the way, Coriz improved security and impartiality in
testing and grading contractor licensing exams. He further
ensured that all the inspections the division was required
to do would be done and, most importantly, as Coriz declared
in an amazing burst of bureaucratic integrity, "the CID
must start being honest."
Sixteen months later, exhausted by the demands of the job,
Coriz resigned his position, left government and moved into
the private sector as an energy consultant.
Sadly, as late at 1988, problems with the CID continued.
Task force after task force "studied" the problem,
"addressed the inconsistencies," worked to "restore
the public's faith in the division." But to no avail.
Finally the State Legislature sunset-ed the division and redirected
its regulatory powers to the individual cities and towns.
Off-setting this unpleasant chapter in New Mexico's construction
industry, the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Outdoor
Recreation began funding and working with states to establish
good state parks. Happily, New Mexico plunged whole-heartedly
into this project and many state parks grew. An excellent
example of this effort is The Smokey Bear Historical State
Park in Capitan, which opened in 1976.
Despite the state-level scandals, the industry itself continued
to expand. As the decade of the 1980s opened, New Mexico was
poised and ready for the explosion of national and international
interest in the state's cultural and historical qualities.
|